Home > Good One > Too Sanguine By Half

Too Sanguine By Half

I have worried for a while about what might happen when we approach the end of March (see for example this comment in January), when the Fed’s buying program officially end. Until today, it seemed that even with all of the concerns about Greece and the ever-growing pile of debt that the Treasury needs to finance the market was remarkably sanguine. Too sanguine, perhaps.

We began the day with Portugal getting downgraded to AA- by Fitch and more back-and-forth about whether Greece can get help from the IMF (which seems the only feasible alternative for her now). Durable Goods was stronger-than-expected, +0.9% ex-transportation, but New Home Sales weaker-than-expected at a new all-time low. It looked like it may be another quiet day, although bonds felt heavy.

Heavy, indeed. As the day went on, Treasuries began to slip more seriously, and swap spreads imploded for a second day. I can’t see sell-side flows from where I sit, so I can’t discern whether this is tied to corporate issuance, as I originally thought (which seems unlikely, now), some speculator blow-up, or simply a panicky technical breakdown as 10y swap spreads break to all-time lows (see chart below, source Bloomberg).

10y Swap Spreads Reached Rock-Bottom (and then started to dig)

There are even some fairly optimistic ways that this sort of contraction in swap spreads could develop, although the fact that the move is so precipitous makes me think they are unlikely: banks currently hold lots of Treasuries in lieu of loans as assets. If a bank suddenly started making lots of floating-rate loans, it would behoove them to sell swap spreads to simultaneously remove the Treasuries from the balance sheet and match their assets (a short-dated, floating-rate loan) to their liabilities (long-dated fixed-rate, ordinarily). I doubt that’s what is happening, but I don’t have a good answer.

The bottom line is that Treasury debt is cheapening relative to other interest rates, which isn’t surprising when there is so much of it. In fact, not only is it not surprising, it is to be expected – and even more than that, it is entirely consistent with history. See the chart below (Source: Bloomberg), which shows that this shouldn’t be particularly surprising after all.

The More You Sell, The Cheaper The Price: Econ 101

Exhibit 2 in that argument? The Treasury today auctioned a $42bln 5y note that was poorly received and sported a long tail. The 10y note contract fell 1-06 today, the biggest drop in some time, and 10-year nominal yields spiked to 3.83%. The intermediate-term chart below shows the importance of today’s selloff. There is some further support for prices between here and 4% yields (see Chart, source Bloomberg),  but this is the wrong time of year to expect support to hold in the bond market.

A Bad Place For Yields With Quarter-End Yet To Come

With the Fed not buying and the Treasury with no choice but to sell, I am not sure I want to be the buyer. I guess I am not the only person thinking that at the moment! We all know that yields are artificially low right now. Soon, we might get to find out how low.

Initial Claims on Thursday is the release of note. Consensus calls for a further improvement, to 450k from 457k. I never seem to hear any commentary about why Claims aren’t improving as fast as the bullish economists keep telling us they should. The forecasts keep getting pushed back – every week is expected to show a little improvement, seemingly because economists sort of think they should be improving. But the 2010 low is still the 433k recorded in the first week of the year. I am singularly unimpressed with the behavior of the Claims data. It is all well and good to say “well, employment is a lagging indicator,” but at some point before we get job growth I would still expect to see businesses stop laying people off! There is also another auction tomorrow, this time of $32bln 7-year notes. How about a little fire, scarecrow?!

Today was a rare exception where we got volatility during the annual NCAA tournament, although to be fair there were no games played today. But the sudden, sharp move in bonds and spreads makes me nervous, especially since March 31st has been making me nervous for a couple of months anyway. As of this writing (3pm ET), stocks are only down 0.5%, but if rates start to trend higher then equities are unlikely to remain an island in the storm. I would be very defensive into the end of the quarter – not because I expect something bad to happen, but because I have no real reason to expect something good to happen.

Categories: Good One
  1. andy
    March 24, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    are you implying that increased supply may have an impact on the market? why, i thought Chairman Bernanke put that idea to rest several months ago when he declared that the stock of bonds that the Fed owns matters more than the flow of bonds that they are buying at any one time.

    • March 24, 2010 at 3:55 pm

      Well, I’ve always thought that normal supply increases only moved spreads, not the level of yields…because more Treasury supply just crowds out corporate supply, so the total amount of supply stays pretty constant (otherwise, the huge increase in issuance in the 1980s should have shot rates higher! But mild improvements in inflation swamped the overall rate effect).

      However, the caveat there is normal. These are crazy amounts of supply, and not only should they affect spreads they may also begin to affect rates in a big way if the market gets sated.

  2. Anon
    March 25, 2010 at 6:31 am

    Any comments on the TIPS market into the carnage in bonds?

    Also, it will be interesting to notice how strong a recovery or less bad data, whatever you want to call it, is with 4%+ 10yr and 90 oil. The US economy cannot support those numbers. Thoughts?

  3. March 25, 2010 at 7:16 am

    I actually will have a comment on TIPS either today or my Friday/Sunday comment. Long TIPS look like a good deal to me. Shorter TIPS seem expensive, although they’re getting better.

    I think the economy can now handle $90 oil, and if the dollar keeps strengthening we won’t have THAT for long. A rise in mortgage rates will definitely slow the recovery, but it’s not like there’s a lot of turnover right now in housing anyway so not sure it weakens things very much. However, I worry about government debt squeezing out private financing and raising the cost of capital for all firms. More on that today.

  4. Anon
    March 25, 2010 at 8:23 am

    Why can we now handle $90 oil? Seems like household debt hasn’t come down enough to warrant that and unemployment is 2x what it was last time around those oil levels.

  5. March 25, 2010 at 9:26 am

    What I mean is, gasoline prices have been around this level for most of ’07, most of ’08, and slightly below here for most of ’09. It won’t feel great, but the shock value is less. But you have a good point – households aren’t as able to handle it now. Gotta think about that a bit. Thanks!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: