Home > Economy > Panic, But Take Your Time

Panic, But Take Your Time


Another day of selloff in the bond market, and I wonder how much fingernail-chewing is happening at the Fed? 10-year Treasury yields rose to 3.27% for the first time since mid-June (see Chart). Forget QE2 at the beginning of November, or the discussion about it at the end of August; in June we had just watched volatility spike and the S&P was undecided about whether to go above 1100 or below 1050 (it eventually did both). Inflation expectations were in retreat.

This is starting to get ugly.

The sharp selloff in bonds is, at some level, not terribly surprising because of the time of year. Illiquidity in December is hardly a news flash, and I always take care to remind people that illiquidity doesn’t mix well with all of the mortgage paper out there that represents “short gamma” positions. More succinctly put, if you start a stone rolling at this time of year, it is often more likely to gather speed than come to rest.

For all of the beating that nominal yields have taken, though, real yields today got it worse. The 10-year real yield surpassed 1% for the first time since September, on a 19bp selloff. 10-year TIPS yields have risen from 0.40% to 1.04% since the Fed started QE2 (see Chart). Keep in mind that this happened on a day in which the Federal Reserve was buying TIPS in the market.

The movement is largely in real yields...the Fed appears to be winning!

Consider the implication that most of the rise in nominal yields has come from the annihilation of inflation-indexed bonds. Observers will want to say that the bond market vigilantes are punishing a profligate Fed, but that is not at all the case. Yields are jumping because growth expectations are soaring. Bernkanke has them snowed, in other words. He has saved the world, and now we’re going to get strong growth and low inflation. Or so the bond market is telling us. No wonder stocks are doing so well!

It’s probably a good idea to put this big rise in yields in perspective. While I think the convincing rejection of any attempt at new lows below the Dec-2008 lows is confirmation that the secular decline in interest rates is indeed history (as I said in early 2009), that doesn’t mean that a secular rise in rates is necessarily imminent. The chart below plots 10-year Treasury yields back to 1980 (I used to do this on Excel because the axis needs to be logarithmic, but now Bloomberg makes the pictures so much prettier).

In the long sweep of time, we're only half-swept.

The big selloff is in context here, in two opposite senses. On the one hand, even though the selloff is “only” 90bps or so, in relative magnitude that is comparable to the roughly 3% selloff from 7.20% in March 1987 to around 10% in October 1987 (I don’t remember what happened next). So 90bps is a big move, in the context of ultra-low rates (and concomitantly long durations).

On the other hand, in the grand scheme of things the selloff only puts yields back in the middle of the secular downtrend. In order to get seriously concerned that a movement significantly higher in rates is about to occur, you’d need to break above 4% or so I think, and confirmation that the secular downtrend is in fact over won’t happen until we have a monthly settle above the upper channel line at around 4.40%.

So panic, but take your time.

I wonder, though, what will happen if Initial Claims tomorrow (Consensus: 425k from 436k) continues the recent trend of improvement. Let’s be clear: the best information that we have on the jobs market, in the form of Employment, the ADP report, and the Consumer Confidence Jobs Hard to Get number, are clearly indicating that the jobs market is still comatose. The Initial Claims data has been stronger recently, and this may be an early sign of improvement elsewhere since employers need to stop firing so many people before they start hiring. But if that was really happening, I would expect to see something upbeat from the answers of the man-on-the-street. We need to keep in mind that Claims in December and even more in January are difficult to seasonally adjust because lots of people are coming and going from the retail establishments. This is especially true at a time when the gross size of payrolls has already shrunk so dramatically. With all that said, if we do get a below-consensus number tomorrow then I’ll take it as reasonable evidence that we can reject the null hypothesis that the underlying run rate of Claims is 445-480k.

So far, though, I think economists are looking too much at the improvement from the 500k print from August (see Chart). Sure, 425k from 500k looks like a trend, but the 500k number wasn’t any more real than the 427k dip from early July. The “trend,” if you want to call it that, is from an average around 455k, so I think people are getting enthusiastic about false optics.

The improvement from the previous range is still pretty feeble. The improvement from the local peak is what has economist (too) excited.

That being said – if the Labor Department were to toss out, say, a 410k figure then the bond market doesn’t have many people waiting around to catch that knife. Initial Claims isn’t something I ordinarily get very excited about, but these days it’s worth keeping an eye on.

Advertisements
Categories: Economy
  1. Mark Voller
    December 9, 2010 at 3:50 am

    What about investors demanding extra concessions for poorer debt profiles ?
    Couldn’t it be the case that the world’s savers , in anticipation of higher food costs, are recycling less of their surpluses into developed world bond markets ?
    Do you think the rise in Spanish bond yields is all growth rerating too ?

  2. December 9, 2010 at 7:07 am

    Sure, but so suddenly? I have no problem believing that the equilibrium real rate is rising…but the sharp rise, combined with rising equity values (your thesis would tend to be associated with LOWER equity values, wouldn’t it?) suggest to me an underlying optimism, not pessimism.

  3. Jim H.
    December 9, 2010 at 8:02 am

    Nice long-term logarithmic chart from the 1981 yield peak!

    At midday yesterday, the 5 and 10-year note yields both rose above the halfway point of their 12-month ranges. It’s brute-simple TA, but if they break through the halfway point, then the next plausible target could be the annual highs.

    I reserve the right to panic sooner rather than later. 😉

  4. December 9, 2010 at 11:31 am

    Hello sir, what is your charting software that you can see initial claims and spread pips and etc? i really want to learn from you. Great Blog so far. i’m a follower now.

    • December 9, 2010 at 4:19 pm

      Hi – Generally I’m using Bloomberg. The economic data you can also find in various places; I like economagic.com . The pricing (spreads, etc) is harder to come by…most of that is sourced Bloomberg.

      Thanks for the compliment!

      • December 11, 2010 at 1:21 am

        I went to http://www.bloomberg.com and didn’t see any charting tool that like your initial claims? I told my friends bout your sites too and didn’t find how to find the economic charts that you mention above. Can you help us with a link to download / browse? Thanks before

  5. December 11, 2010 at 8:36 am

    I’m sorry…you need to have the Bloomberg Professional Service, which is around $1700 per month (generally, you need to be working for a financial institution!).

    • December 11, 2010 at 9:51 pm

      Oh ok Thanks Michael. We will be following up this great website of yours.

  1. December 14, 2010 at 5:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: