Home > Economy > A Hint – Just A Hint – Of A Breather

A Hint – Just A Hint – Of A Breather


It may have been predominantly the ‘bots trading today (or, equivalently, the junior traders), because the market mostly ignored information that was mostly bad. Here is a quick run-down:

Initial Claims did not decline back to the prior trend, but rather printed at 403k and last week’s surprise was revised higherto 416k. This news caused a reaction in the bond market, as I had thought it would if it happened, but that jump in bond prices was erased quickly. The chart below shows ‘Claims. The couple weeks of higher numbers are not cause for alarm; only a couple weeks of data in this volatile series doesn’t add a lot of information. If you put your hand over the pre-March period, it looks like an uptrend, but this is an optical illusion. The fairer supposition is that Claims have temporarily stabilized around the 380-410k level. If that turns out to be true, it should be discouraging for those who are bullish on the economy because that level of Claims is not consistent with the steady job growth the economy bulls require (and the Fed desires).

It's not an uptrend in Claims, but neither is it still a downtrend.

There is a more benign possibility behind the jump in Claims. It could be that this bump higher is related to Japan-supply-chain disruptions. Goldman Sachs put out an analysis today about the effects of the supply chain disruptions on GDP, and made the point that one main supplier (40% market share) of auto microcontrollers has “several key facilities in the affected area [of Japan].” Goldman’s auto analysts expect roughly a 10% decline in North American vehicle production in Q2, due (mostly) to a shortage of MCUs. This is just a guess (albeit an educated one), but my point in bringing it up is to note that this by itself is clearly a disruption large enough to cause a mild blip higher in layoffs. And auto manufacturing will not be the only industry affected by supply chain issues.

As I said, though, this is a relatively benign interpretation, because if it is accurate then once MCU production and auto production and other supply wrinkles are ironed out then ‘Claims could and should move lower once again…assuming that the bullish view of the economy is correct.

Also casting a shadow on the economic outlook was the sharp and unexpected decline in the Philly Fed Index to 18.5 from 43.4, when 36.9 was expected (there followed another jump in bonds, and another retracement). That also is not a cataclysm: an index above 0 indicates that things are getting better, and this just means they are getting better at a slower pace. But, as with Initial Claims, this is a little discouraging to the economic-boom crowd because a moderation now in the recovery process is too early if we’re going to get unemployment from 9% to something reasonable in a bearable period of time.

The FHFA Home Price Index report isn’t usually worth pointing out, but in this case I will take administrative note of the fact that the 1.6% month/month decline was the second-worst on record behind only November 2008. There is a ton of noise in this series, but this is still a bad month. Nevertheless, even here you could try for a positive spin if you really worked at it: one might argue that higher home sales numbers at lower prices suggests that sellers are finally capitulating and the inventory is clearing. That’s a stretch, however, since the inventory numbers themselves haven’t declined.

Finally, the dollar today broke marginally below the December 2009 low in very light volume. This helped push commodities higher yet again.

To be clear, on my vacation next week I am not going to worry about automotive supply chain issues, the weakening in the Philly Fed survey, home price indices, or the dollar index. These are all concerns, but they are not big concerns at the moment. Evidently this is also true for equity investors. We will see what a week’s seasoning will do and what spin (if any) the FOMC puts on the deceleration in its statement after Wednesday’s meeting. And I will write again on or about May 2nd.

Advertisements
Categories: Economy
  1. Duncan Hume
    April 21, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    Have a great holiday

  2. BobJ
    May 2, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20110502/ts_dailybeast/13790_niallfergusonthegreatinflationofthe2010s

    Hoping you had a good vacation. I was just curious if you think that the BLS would change their criteria for the CPI to make the CPI numbers higher than their current figures are showing. This would be to stem criticism for the perception that it’s out of sync with “actual” inflation. I don’t think they would do this to appease all the people who question the CPI, but it was a thought that occurred to me. Thanks again.

    • May 2, 2011 at 9:07 pm

      No, I think the guys at the BLS are seasoned, pocket-protector-type econometricians. They really don’t care whether people think their number isn’t right, because they believe it is (and I agree, for what they want to do it does it very well). It bothers them that as much as they answer the questions…poke around at http://www.bls.gov/cpi and look at all of the things that have been written on the treatment of housing, FAQ on hedonic adjustment…some people still accuse them of cooking the numbers.

      However, as I’ve written before it makes perfect sense to go and look for better ways to measure how inflation FEELS to people. And in fact, I am just about to start a consulting project with a big firm to develop just such an index, based partly on the methodology I have written about in the past. I think it will be a very useful index!

      • BobJ
        May 3, 2011 at 12:04 am

        Great. Thanks. As usual, your thoughtful answer makes perfect sense.

        I guess it’s just natural for people to look at complex indexes like the CPI and want it to reflect their broad perceptions. + what constitutes “actual” inflation? One person’s “actual” inflation is probably going to different than another person’s “actual” inflation. Oh well. Anyway, thanks again.

      • May 3, 2011 at 6:30 am

        Absolutely! Just because the average temp in the nation is 72 degrees doesn’t mean that it is 72 degrees where you live right now! But that doesn’t mean the national average is wrong, right?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: