Home > Europe, Politics > €160 Billion Later, Not Much Closer To Resolution

€160 Billion Later, Not Much Closer To Resolution


If €160 billion could somehow be an unimportant amount, today it was. But before we get to the latest discouraging result from the EU, let’s do a quick survey of the prior news first.

We’ll start with last night’s speech by the head of the Fed’s SOMA account, Brian Sack. Now, I know that isn’t what readers want to know about, so I’ll just include a little snippet. Sack, talking about how QE2 went over, said:

“Despite its limits, the expansion of the balance sheet was seen by the FOMC as the best policy tool available at the time, given the constraint on traditional monetary policy easing from the zero bound on interest rates. The willingness of the FOMC to use this tool is indicative of a central bank that takes its dual mandate seriously and does what it can to deliver on it. The disappointing pace of recovery that has been realized since then suggests that the additional policy accommodation provided by the LSAP2 program was appropriate.”

Wait, what? Where is Tivo when you need it? Did he say that the decision to deploy QE2 (LSAP2) was proven to be justified because it didn’t work?

Keep in mind that speeches by senior Fed officials are ordinarily proofread and vetted a number of times. So it seems that everyone who proofread Dr. Sack’s speech felt vindicated by the fact that growth slowed between the time QE2 was instituted and when it ended. I wonder what failure would have looked like!

This morning started with Initial Claims, printing weaker-than-expectations at 418k. Leading Indicators came in at 0.3%, near expectations. Surprisingly, the Philly Fed index did bounce to 3.2, which was even a little bit more of a bounce than economists were expecting. That behavior stands in contrast to the weak Empire figure and therefore clarifies neither.

The TIPS auction went rather well. (Incidentally, an erratum is due here. Yesterday I quoted the WI 10y TIPS based on Bloomberg’s numbers, which were completely off. Instead of 0.48%, it was around 0.63%. I should have known better, since I knew the roll was trading around pick-8. My apologies for the error!). The bid:cover was 2.62:1, and the auction stopped through the screens (that is, no tail). Direct bidders took about three times their normal share, around 13.7%. The extra billion they took down allowed dealers to take a billion less, so there is less to clean up. With 10-year nominal yields up 8bps on the day to 3.01%, 10-year real yields were unchanged so inflation expectations rose about 8bps: 10y CPI swaps ended up around 2.82%, once again threatening the highs for the last few years.

None of this mattered. Stocks took any and every excuse to rally. It rallied on good data. It rallied on bad data. It rallied on the rumor that Greece was going to be allowed to default (I suppose because France and Germany had come to an agreement on it). The bullish interpretation is that the market seemed to do really well with bad news. The bearish interpretation is that the news sucks.

It looked like there was a chance it could be worse than it was. As the afternoon dragged on, dealer “analysis of the debt crisis summit” calls began to be postponed. Overnight, we had heard that Sarkozy and Merkel had come to a meeting of the minds (whatever that means when the two people we are talking about are Sarkozy and Merkel); if so, then where was the announcement of the grand plan?

Just before 3:00 ET, French President Sarkozy began to speak with reporters on the results of the meeting. This was our first indication that the meeting was over. There was no communiqué; all of the politicians just started holding press conferences.

I want to make one quick observation here. It is much easier to say something in a press conference and later take it back, than it is to say something in a communiqué that you later want to withdraw.

Sarkozy’s comments meandered; there was lots of “we pledged this” and “we can’t let that happen” and so on. We heard there were “strong measures taken.” Great, Mr. Sarkozy. Isn’t the communiqué supposed to tell us what those measures are?

I imagine that there will be a document of some kind eventually, but perhaps not. We know the general outlines of the grand bargain, though, and … it’s pretty much what we already thought it was, and it isn’t grand. Here’s what Sarkozy said (and it was in substance – whatever that term means when it is Sarkozy speaking – confirmed by other ministerial mutterings):

  • There will be a European Monetary Fund (basically IMF-Europe) that will have the power to “operate on secondary markets” (that is, manipulate bond markets) and can recap banks. Sarkozy did not mention a timetable, and it is unclear how this helps Greece today.
  • The interest rate on the bailout loan will be lowered. I guess this is like a “loan mod” for a sovereign nation. Since Iceland has already demonstrated the proposition that once the money has been dispensed, the terms can be renegotiated to a lower interest rate, this isn’t much of a concession especially if the alternative is default, now is it?
  • These measures “won’t be repeated for other states.” He didn’t say which measures, but it seems a funny thing to say if you’re saving Greece partly to stop the run on Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Spain!
  • Sarkozy wants a “European rating company.” Any guesses as to whether it will be tougher than S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch when it comes to rating European banks and sovereigns? “LeCredit…they understand us, mon frères.
  • The private sector will contribute €135bln, in thirty years. That’s actually the way he said it, which is kinda funny when you think about it. It’s really the next thirty days that is the concern with Greece, isn’t it? What he meant was that private bondholders will be forced into a conversion that will make them lenders for thirty years. What he really meant is that the contribution will essentially be made over the next thirty years, as banks carry the bonds at par and just suffer a much-worse-than-market interest rate. That’s really the optimistic version; the more likely version is that the private sector will contribute those sums, and a lot more, within a few months or a year when Greece defaults anyway.

I might have taken this press conference for a farce and a bad joke, if I hadn’t known it was not. The French President, echoed by other senior European figures, said “Greece will repay its debts.” Hold it just a minute, Monsieur President…isn’t that Greece’s decision to make? The EU can make many decisions that affect Greece, but surely the French and Germans don’t get to decide if Greece defaults. At best, they can make it less-advantageous for them to do so, although it isn’t clear they have done that yet.

The grand plan, the meeting of the minds, appears to have basically produced the plan that the French already liked, Merkel had already rejected, and the ratings agencies had already said would probably be a default. I don’t see any new cash. And yet, the stock market rallied. The dollar was whacked to 6-week lows, while equities gained 1.4%. Crude oil rallied 1.2% and is near $100 again although commodities as a whole weakened.

After the close, M2 was released; it rose slightly in the most-recent week. Since it didn’t retrace any of the recent spike, the period-on-period growth rates remain elevated and worrisome.

I think that once Friday dawns investors will realize that the European deal isn’t that big a deal, isn’t even ratified yet, and seems short on specifics. I remain bearish on stocks but I will say this: if we get past the debt crisis – and by ‘past’ I mean that fiscal and monetary authorities are able to extinguish the contagion and stabilize the woefully under-capitalized banks in a convincing way – then the backdrop otherwise is improving somewhat. The problem with equities is that they already incorporate much of that improvement in the price without incorporating much of the risk, but I don’t think it would be impossible to inflate a little mini-bubble. It would be hard to keep it going, because interest rates would have to rise and basically the perfect environment for stocks – low and stable interest rates and inflation – would turn into something less-perfect. But I can imagine the stock market rallying, even from here, if, and it is a very big if, the sovereign debt crisis is stayed for now.

Of course, with the amount of debt and the size of the deficits, the crisis will not go away forever. Indeed, there are plenty of other crises waiting in the wings including the U.S. deficit situation and the wall of money waiting to pour into transactional balances and inflation. But if I pucker up my face just right, tilt my head and squint, I can imagine the equities bull market getting one more leg.

But I am not positioned that way. I am positioned short, through put options, and our models are long commodities and cash in preference to TIPS and equities. The odds still favor a bad outcome for the long equity investor, especially in real terms.

Advertisements
Categories: Europe, Politics
  1. USIKPA
    July 22, 2011 at 4:10 am

    Would you consider commodity currencies’ investments now if you are long commodities (that is, oil, as well)?

    • July 22, 2011 at 5:32 am

      Yes, assuming the currency in question is of a country that has its fiscal house more or less in order.

  2. Jeremy Fletcher
    July 22, 2011 at 9:55 am

    “Mes frères” is the correct grammar. Default is yours.

  3. July 22, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    Three years at a French bank and all I got was this lousy t-shirt! 🙂

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: