Home > Bond Market, TIPS > No Strategic Reason to Own Nominal Bonds Now

No Strategic Reason to Own Nominal Bonds Now


Today I presented our 2016 inflation forecast to the investment committee for a multifamily office, and when I was putting the presentation together I developed one slide that really is a must-see for investors in my opinion.

For some time, TIPS have been too cheap. Really, it has been more than a year that our metrics have shown inflation-linked bonds as not just cheap, but really cheap compared to nominal bonds. I don’t mean that real yields will fall – so this isn’t a statement about whether I am bullish or bearish on fixed-income. Frankly, I am somewhat conflicted on that point at this moment.

Rather, it is a statement about what sort of fixed-income instruments to own, for that part of your portfolio that needs to be in fixed-income. If you are running a diversified portfolio, then you can’t really avoid owning some bonds even if you are bearish on the bond market. For risk-reduction reasons if for no other, it makes sense to own some bonds.

But you don’t have to own fixed-coupon nominal bonds (or, for that matter, floating-coupon nominal bonds which are still exposed to inflation through the principal of the instrument). In fact, right now it is hard for me to imagine betting on nominal bonds for the portion of my portfolio that is in fixed-income.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so here is the picture:

compoundedinfl

The chart shows rolling, compounded 10-year inflation rates for as far back as we have reasonable data. And it shows the current level of 10-year inflation “breakevens.” What this means is that if you are long Treasuries, rather than TIPS, you will do better over the next ten years if inflation is below 1.34% and above roughly zero. If we have big deflation, TIPS will do just about as well since they are also principal protected; if we have any inflation over 1.34%, TIPS will do better.

And as the chart points out, since the Fed has been formed we have literally had almost zero 10-year periods in which inflation was in the 0-1.34% zone. Perhaps the 10-year periods ending early in the Great Depression, en route to big deflation, or coming out of the Great Depression heading into WWII. But otherwise, inflation has always been either higher or, in a Fed-screw-up scenario, much lower.

Put another way, it means that if you choose to own nominal bonds instead of inflation-linked bonds for the next 10 years, you are short a straddle on inflation, and you’re not being paid much to be short it. (Technically, you’re short a zero-cost ratio call spread since you don’t lose in deflation, but I’m trying to keep it simple!)

There may be tactical reasons to prefer nominal bonds to inflation-linked bonds. But to me, there is no clear strategic reason to be long nominal bonds for that portion of your portfolio that you intend to keep in fixed-income.

Advertisements
Categories: Bond Market, TIPS
  1. February 2, 2016 at 10:36 am

    Michael, any chance you might have some thoughts to share on NIRP effects on inflation? Two thoughts come to mind: either it gooses inflation via velocity (might as well buy something that returns at least zero) or it crushes inflation expectations via the withdrawal and hoarding of cash balances (justified by central banks removal of “safe” returns, however small, that kills any incentive to take more risky bets)

    EZ countries, now Japan are going NIRP. Will the US get there too? What are the long term effects here, and how might any investor plan for this “bizzaro” world?

    Thanks again for your considered thoughts!

    • February 2, 2016 at 11:31 am

      Hope to write this article today. Short answer is that it ought to lower money velocity and thereby lower inflation somewhat. But not a lot, since rates in Japan are not going much lower than they already were. Will have zero effect on us, of course, unless the Fed eventually does the same crazy thing.

      From: E-piphany To: cpi_trader@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:36 AM Subject: [E-piphany] Comment: “No Strategic Reason to Own Nominal Bonds Now” #yiv0591373452 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv0591373452 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv0591373452 a.yiv0591373452primaryactionlink:link, #yiv0591373452 a.yiv0591373452primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv0591373452 a.yiv0591373452primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv0591373452 a.yiv0591373452primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv0591373452 WordPress.com | | |

  1. March 8, 2016 at 9:27 pm
  2. April 6, 2016 at 8:25 pm
  3. April 26, 2016 at 7:22 pm
  4. April 27, 2016 at 9:49 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: